February 4th, 2021

• This is an "Orphan" page. Its core content has not been shared: what you see below is a loose collection of pages and page snippets that mention this page, as well as snippets of this page that were quoted elsewhere.

• Other things to look up:
  • Brain-computer interface (BCI) field, to bring into Scribbles on dimensions of technology to expand the section on how there's been a progression from punch cards up (see here)
    • Wolpaw, J., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D., Pfurtscheller, G., and Vaughan, T. (2002). Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 767–791. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3
    • Lebedev, M. A., and Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2006). Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 29, 536–546. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006. 07.004
  • The idea of the tool being embodied within the user as a "symbiotic tool"
    • Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Trans. Hum. Factors Electron. HFE 1, 4–11. doi: 10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259
    • Brangier, É., and Hammes-Adelé, S. (2011). “Beyond the technology acceptance model: elements to validate the human-technology symbiosis model,” in Ergonomics and Health Aspects, HCII 2011, LNCS 6779, ed. M. M. Robertson (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 13–21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21716-6_2
• Brain-computer interface (BCI) field, to bring into Scribbles on dimensions of technology to expand the section on how there's been a progression from punch cards up (see here)
  • Wolpaw, J., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D., Pfurtscheller, G., and Vaughan, T. (2002). Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 767–791. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3
  • Lebedev, M. A., and Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2006). Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 29, 536–546. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006. 07.004
• Wolpaw, J., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D., Pfurtscheller, G., and Vaughan, T. (2002). Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 767–791. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3
• Lebedev, M. A., and Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2006). Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 29, 536–546. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006. 07.004
• The idea of the tool being embodied within the user as a "symbiotic tool"
  • Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Trans. Hum. Factors Electron. HFE 1, 4–11. doi: 10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259
  • Brangier, É., and Hammes-Adelé, S. (2011). “Beyond the technology acceptance model: elements to validate the human-technology symbiosis model,” in Ergonomics and Health Aspects, HCII 2011, LNCS 6779, ed. M. M. Robertson (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 13–21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21716-6_2
• Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Trans. Hum. Factors Electron. HFE 1, 4–11. doi: 10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259
• Brangier, É., and Hammes-Adelé, S. (2011). “Beyond the technology acceptance model: elements to validate the human-technology symbiosis model,” in Ergonomics and Health Aspects, HCII 2011, LNCS 6779, ed. M. M. Robertson (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 13–21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21716-6_2