This is an "Orphan" page. Its core content has not been shared: what you see below is a loose collection of pages and page snippets that mention this page, as well as snippets of this page that were quoted elsewhere.
Content, Timing, Structure
Content = the behaviors themselves.
Marks et al. (2001) taxonomy of 10 behaviors
They built on 7 from Prince and Salas (1993) and 3 from Canon-Bowers, Tannenbaum, Salas, & Volpe (1995)
Timing = When the behaviors happen
Marks et al. (2001) Action, Transition, Interpersonal
Structure = The complex network of dynamic team interactions
Crawford & LePine (2013), must consider the configuration of team interactions. 3 specific types:
Closure, Centralization, Subgrouping
(Need to look up closure - not fully following from Seely's dissertation)
Centralization is concentration of individuals. Crawford & LePine (2013) suggest the 'what' should be centralized (~1 person), the 'how' should be decentralized (democratized).
Subgrouping = when have subsets of connections. Enable specialization, enhanced communication within each group, but can increase ingroup bias. Posit that if no connections between subgroups, can negatively effect team functioning.
me Very related to MTS - basically saying that if it's an MTS, need to clarify the function of the connections between teams.
Content = the behaviors themselves.
Marks et al. (2001) taxonomy of 10 behaviors
They built on 7 from Prince and Salas (1993) and 3 from Canon-Bowers, Tannenbaum, Salas, & Volpe (1995)
Marks et al. (2001) taxonomy of 10 behaviors
They built on 7 from Prince and Salas (1993) and 3 from Canon-Bowers, Tannenbaum, Salas, & Volpe (1995)
Timing = When the behaviors happen
Marks et al. (2001) Action, Transition, Interpersonal
Marks et al. (2001) Action, Transition, Interpersonal
Structure = The complex network of dynamic team interactions
Crawford & LePine (2013), must consider the configuration of team interactions. 3 specific types:
Closure, Centralization, Subgrouping
(Need to look up closure - not fully following from Seely's dissertation)
Centralization is concentration of individuals. Crawford & LePine (2013) suggest the 'what' should be centralized (~1 person), the 'how' should be decentralized (democratized).
Subgrouping = when have subsets of connections. Enable specialization, enhanced communication within each group, but can increase ingroup bias. Posit that if no connections between subgroups, can negatively effect team functioning.
me Very related to MTS - basically saying that if it's an MTS, need to clarify the function of the connections between teams.
Crawford & LePine (2013), must consider the configuration of team interactions. 3 specific types:
Closure, Centralization, Subgrouping
(Need to look up closure - not fully following from Seely's dissertation)
Centralization is concentration of individuals. Crawford & LePine (2013) suggest the 'what' should be centralized (~1 person), the 'how' should be decentralized (democratized).
Subgrouping = when have subsets of connections. Enable specialization, enhanced communication within each group, but can increase ingroup bias. Posit that if no connections between subgroups, can negatively effect team functioning.
me Very related to MTS - basically saying that if it's an MTS, need to clarify the function of the connections between teams.
Closure, Centralization, Subgrouping
(Need to look up closure - not fully following from Seely's dissertation)
Centralization is concentration of individuals. Crawford & LePine (2013) suggest the 'what' should be centralized (~1 person), the 'how' should be decentralized (democratized).
Subgrouping = when have subsets of connections. Enable specialization, enhanced communication within each group, but can increase ingroup bias. Posit that if no connections between subgroups, can negatively effect team functioning.
me Very related to MTS - basically saying that if it's an MTS, need to clarify the function of the connections between teams.